THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES

Authors

  • Siti Intan Nurdiana Wong Abdullah Management Business, Nottingham Trent University
  • Puspa Rini Akuntansi, Universitas Pat Petulai
  • Nirsetyo Wahdi Akuntansi, Universitas Semarang
  • Sylvia Kartika Dhamayanti Administrasi bisnis, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kosgoro 1957

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61677/count.v2i4.550

Keywords:

Management control systems, financial performance, digital maturity, interactive controls, emerging markets

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between Management Control Systems (MCS) and financial performance in manufacturing companies operating in emerging economies, with a specific focus on Indonesia. It further explores the moderating effects of digital maturity and organizational culture to understand how contextual factors influence the effectiveness of MCS. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected through structured questionnaires from 120 financial and operational managers across Indonesian manufacturing firms. The research employed multiple linear regression and moderated regression analysis (MRA), supported by SmartPLS and SPSS software, to test the direct and interaction effects between variables. The results reveal that both diagnostic and interactive control systems significantly impact financial performance, with interactive controls demonstrating a stronger influence. Moreover, digital maturity positively moderates the relationship between MCS and financial outcomes, while organizational culture shows no significant moderating effect. The novelty of this research lies in its integration of digital readiness as a strategic enabler within the MCS framework, offering new theoretical and empirical insights, especially in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in developing markets. This study also contributes methodologically by applying a dual-theory approach—combining contingency theory with dynamic capabilities theory—to better capture the adaptive use of control systems under technological disruption. In conclusion, effective MCS implementation, especially when supported by digital infrastructure, can enhance financial performance and strategic agility, making it a critical tool for organizational competitiveness in globalized markets.

References

Al-Haddad, L., Kot, S., & Badi, K. S. (2022). The impact of digital transformation on management control and financial performance: Evidence from developing economies. Sustainability, 14(3), 1625. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031625

Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Yan, Z. (2017). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.003

Bedford, D. S., Malmi, T., & Sandelin, M. (2022). Balancing diagnostic and interactive control systems: A dynamic capability perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 95, 101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101322

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7

Dekker, H. C., Groot, T., & Schoute, M. (2022). Interactive control use and performance: A meta-analysis. Management Accounting Research, 54, 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2022.100793

Granlund, M., & Lukka, K. (2017). Investigating highly established research paradigms: Reviving contextuality in contingency theory-based management accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 45, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.11.003

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com

Hall, M. (2016). Realising the strategic benefits of management control systems: A review and framework. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 12(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2015-0040

Knudsen, T. (2020). Management control systems in the age of digital transformation: A literature review. Journal of Management Control, 31(3), 345–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00310-w

Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. M. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.04.002

Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0115

Sarstedt, M., & Cheah, J. H. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 7, 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-019-00058-3

Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press.

Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2018). A conceptual development of Simons’ levers of control framework. Management Accounting Research, 39, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.03.003

Turel, O., Liu, P., & Bart, C. (2021). Board-level IT governance and financial performance: The moderating role of digital capability. Information & Management, 58(7), 103516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103516

Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.01.001

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

Siti Intan Nurdiana Wong Abdullah, Puspa Rini, Nirsetyo Wahdi, & Sylvia Kartika Dhamayanti. (2025). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES. Count : Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 2(4), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.61677/count.v2i4.550