FROM NATURAL EDUCATION TO MORAL FORMATION: A CONTEMPORARY REINTERPRETATION OF ROUSSEAU’S ÉMILE

Daya Negri Wijaya; Prisca Kiki Wulandari

doi:10.61677/satmata.v4i1.1006

Authors

Daya Negri Wijaya Departement of History, Universitas Negeri Malang
Prisca Kiki Wulandari Departement of Goverment Studies, Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61677/satmata.v4i1.1006

Keywords:

Rousseau, Émile, natural education, moral deformation, naturalistic moral formation

Abstract

Contemporary education faces growing concerns about moral deformation, including bullying, intolerance, academic dishonesty, digital misconduct, and declining empathy. This study aims to reread Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Émile as a philosophical resource for reconstructing moral education through the concept of naturalistic moral formation. Using library research, the study analyzes Rousseau’s natural education through thematic coding, conceptual analysis, and philosophical interpretation. The analysis focuses on five dimensions: protection of the child’s nature from social distortion, autonomy of child development, epistemology of direct experience, graduality of natural education, and nature as a formative space. The findings show that Rousseau’s “return to nature” is not a rejection of education, but a critique of artificial, coercive, adult-centered, and instruction-based moral formation. Natural education forms moral agency by protecting the child from premature social pressures, grounding knowledge in lived experience, respecting developmental stages, and using nature and everyday life as pedagogical environments. The discussion argues that Rousseau’s framework complements contemporary character education, civic education, and social-emotional learning while challenging their tendency toward formalized value transmission. This study contributes to educational philosophy by formulating naturalistic moral formation as a non-indoctrinative, experiential, and developmentally appropriate model for addressing moral deformation in contemporary education.

References

Alwi, N. A., Dona, T. R., Nasution, D. E., & Lestari, E. E. (2023). Why do students engage in bullying? Other factors found to contribute to student bullying. JP (Jurnal Pendidikan) : Teori dan Praktik, 8(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v8n2.p161-171

Arne, S. Y. (2023). Rousseau’s Herbarium, or The Art of Living Together. Open Cultural Studies, 7(1). 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1515/culture-2022-0167

Balieiro, M. R. (2012). Natureza e degradação moral em Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Cadernos de Ética e Filosofia Política, 2(21), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1517-0128.v2i21p56-63

Cardinale, P., Rofi’i, M. S., Samputra, P. L., & Achdiawan, R. (2021). Enculturated Education for Strengthening Character Education in Preventing Intolerance and Radicalism. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 8(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v8i1.20359

Cipriano, C., Strambler, M. J., Naples, L. H., Ha, C., Kirk, M., Wood, M., Sehgal, K., Zieher, A. K., Eveleigh, A., McCarthy, M., Funaro, M., Ponnock, A., Chow, J. C., & Durlak, J. (2023). The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta‐analysis of universal school‐based SEL interventions. Child Development, 94(5), 1181–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13968

Dalbosco, C. A., & Rossetto, M. da S. (2019). John Dewey como leitor de Jean-Jacques Rousseau: O problema da formação das capacidades humanas. Praxis Educativa, 14(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.14n1.004

Engh, C. (2019). Natural Education in Wollstonecraft’s Wrongs of Woman and Rousseau’s Emile. English Language Notes, 57(2), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1215/00138282-7716136

Fraistat, S. (2016). Domination and Care in Rousseau’s Emile. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000472

France, P. (1995). Quintilian and Rousseau: Oratory and Education. Rhetorica, 13(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1995.13.3.301

Hanley, R. P. (2008). Commerce and Corruption: Rousseau’s Diagnosis and Adam Smith’s Cure. European Journal of Political Theory, 7(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107086445

Hermann, N. (2013). Virtude e amor em Rousseau. História da Educação, 17, 29–42.

Kim, J., Scroggins, J. K., Ledbetter, L., & Gagne, J. C. D. (2023). Cyberincivility among Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3777386/v1

Landrum, T. (2014). The Education of Amour-Propre. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 11(3), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-4681040

LeBlanc, A. (2022). Seeing Like Sophie: Developing Judgment in Rousseau’s Émile. The Review of Politics, 84(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670522000079

Letseka, M. (2014). Ubuntu and Justice as Fairness. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 544-551. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n9p544

Lim, J. H., Rho, E., & Yang, C. (2026). Evidence-Based Practices of Culturally Responsive Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. School Psychology Review, 55(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2024.2432853

Önder, M. (2018). J. J. Rousseau, Emile and Religious Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1539–1545. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060714

Paiva, W. A. de. (2015). Da Representação no Processo Educacional: Entre a Festa e o Espetáculo. Trans/Form/Ação, 38, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732015000400004

Phillips, J. L., & McMillian, L. (2011). Liberal Civic Education, Religious Commitment, and the Spillover Thesis: What Psychology Can Teach Us. Politics and Religion, 4(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048310000532

Reuter, M. (2014). “Like a Fanciful Kind of Half Being”: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Criticism of Jean‐Jacques Rousseau. Hypatia, 29(4), 925–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12105

Rousseau, J. J. (2024). Emile (B. Foxley, Trans.). E-Kitap Projesi & Cheapest Books.

Schaeffer, D. (2010). Realism, Rhetoric and the Possibility of Reform in Rousseau’s “Considerations on the Government of Poland.” Polity, 42(3), 377–397.

Simpson, E. (1983). Emile’s Moral Development: A Rousseauan Perspective on Kohlberg. Human Development, 26(4), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272883

Slonina, E. V. (2024). A Third Birth: Rousseau’s Education to Moral Judgment in Julie, or the New Heloise. Political Theory, 52(6), 931–955. https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917241268595

Stachoň, M. (2021). Enlightenment and Social Progress – Back to the Enlightenment. Studia z Historii Filozofii, 12(4), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2021.019

Surahman, E., & Wang, T.-H. (2022). Academic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1535–1553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12708

Tennyson, Timothy. T., & Schwarze, M. (2024). An honest man?: Rousseau’s critique of Locke’s character education. European Journal of Political Theory, 23(4), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851231153567

Terquem, S. (2012). Le Surmoi, un législateur ? Rousseau, Kelsen et Freud. Enfances & Psy, 57(4), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.3917/ep.057.0116

Utami, P. T. (2022). Raising religious inherency: The role of interreligious competence in achieving religious education equality in multireligious public schools in Indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 271. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01298-y

Warner, J. (2014). Bad Education: Pity, Moral Learning, and the Limits of Rousseauan Friendship. The Review of Politics, 76(2), 243–266.

Zagorac, I. (2020). Mogućnosti i granice odgoja za suosjećanje. Jahr : Europski časopis za bioetiku, 11(2), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.21860/j.11.2.8

Zhang, L. (2022). Chinese Traditional Culture Education: Implementing the Child’s Position and Perspective in the Elementary School Textbook Morality and Law. ECNU Review of Education, 5(4), 702–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531121990509