GOTIKSWAN AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF NUNGGAK SEMI

Authors

  • Daya Negri Wijaya History Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Deny Yudo Wahyudi History Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Andhika Yudha Pratama Department of Law and Citizenship, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Firza Azzam Fadilla History Department, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61677/satmata.v4i1.1007

Keywords:

Gotikswan, Nunggak Semi, cultural revitalization, Indonesian batik, keris

Abstract

Go Tik Swan Hardjonagoro (Gotikswan) is one of Indonesia’s cultural figures who has played a significant role in the development of Indonesian batik and the preservation of Javanese culture through the Nunggak Semi philosophy. This study aims to reconstruct Gotikswan’s thoughts on the Nunggak Semi philosophy and analyze its implementation in the development of Indonesian batik and the preservation of the keris. The study employs a library research approach, drawing on published scholarship and UNESCO institutional heritage records analyzed descriptively and interpretively through data reduction, categorization, and thematic interpretation. The results of the study indicate that the Nunggak Semi philosophy views culture as a dynamic entity; thus, cultural preservation is not interpreted as a static effort to maintain traditions, but rather as ensuring the sustainability of cultural values through a process of innovation that remains rooted in tradition. Gotikswan embodies this philosophy through the development of Indonesian batik that integrates the cultural diversity of the Indonesian archipelago, as well as through the preservation of the keris tradition, which emphasizes the regeneration of knowledge, skills, and cultural communities. Thus, Nunggak Semi offers a paradigm for cultural revitalization that blends tradition and innovation as a strategy to ensure the sustainability of Indonesia’s cultural heritage.

References

Abdul Aziz, N. A., Mohd Ariffin, N. F., Ismail, N. A., & Alias, A. (2023). Community Participation in the Importance of Living Heritage Conservation and Its Relationships with the Community-Based Education Model towards Creating a Sustainable Community in Melaka UNESCO World Heritage Site. Sustainability, 15(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031935

Ashworth, G., Graham, B., & Tunbridge, J. (2007). Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Soci. Pluto Press.

C., K. de B. (1937). Keris and other Malay Weapons. Nature, 139(3506), 51–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/139051b0

Chung, F. M. Y. (2024). Utilising technology as a transmission strategy in intangible cultural heritage: The case of Cantonese opera performances. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 30(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2284723

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation Of Cultures. Basic Books.

Grafita, A., & Rudianto, M. (2023). Indonesian Batik Study of Go Tik Swan at 1950-1990 Period in Surakarta. TAMA: Journal of Visual Arts, 1(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.61405/tama.v1i1.685

Graham, B., Ashworth, G., & Tunbridge, J. (2016). A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy. Routledge.

Harrison, R. (2012). Heritage: Critical Approaches. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108857

Katapidi, I. (2023). The role of conservation policies in local understandings of heritage in living heritage places: A Greek testimony. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 29(4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2181377

Koentjaraningrat. (2002). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Rineka Cipta.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications.

Lam, E. W. M., Zhang, F., & Ho, J. K. C. (2022). Effectiveness and Advancements of Heritage Revitalizations on Community Planning: Case Studies in Hong Kong. Buildings, 12(8), Article 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081065

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Pramono, S. (2019). Semiotika Visual Dalam Pertukaran Tanda dan Makna Sosial Politik Pada Batik Karya Hardjonagoro Go Tik Swan. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 18(3), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2019.18.3.16

Pramono, S. (2021). Semangat Kebangsaan Sebagai Ekspresi Seni Batik Hardjonagoro Go Tik Swan Era 1956-1966 [Dissertation]. Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Quang, T. D. (2022). Is Living Heritage Ignored? Revisiting Heritage Conservation at Cham Living-Heritage Sites in Vietnam. Heritage & Society, 15(1), 46–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2022.2126234

Rustopo. (2008). Menjadi Jawa: Orang-Orang Tionghoa dan Kebudayaan Jawa.

Safitri, R. A., & Ikaputra, I. (2024). Living Heritage sebagai Pendekatan Konservasi: Sebuah Studi Literatur. Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 21, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v21i1.2450

Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263

Smith, L., & Akagawa, N. (2009). Intangible Heritage. Routledge.

Tirta, I. (1996). Batik: A Play of Light and Shades. Gaya Favorit Press.

UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. UNESCO. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention

UNESCO. (2005). The Indonesian Kris. UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/the-indonesian-kris-00112

UNESCO. (2009). Indonesian batik. UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/indonesian-batik-00170

Zed, M. (2025). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Published

2026-09-22

How to Cite

Wijaya, D. N., Wahyudi, D. Y., Pratama, A. Y., & Fadilla, F. A. (2026). GOTIKSWAN AND THE PHILOSOPHY OF NUNGGAK SEMI. Satmata: Journal of Historical Education Studies, 4(1), 64 ~ 77. https://doi.org/10.61677/satmata.v4i1.1007