TEACHING THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS: A LITERATURE REVIEW ON STRATEGIES AND CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61677/smart.v3i1.608Keywords:
Indonesian language instruction, primary education, literacy strategies, multilingual classroom, systematic literature reviewAbstract
This study aims to explore and synthesize the strategies and challenges in teaching the Indonesian language at the primary school level through a systematic literature review method. Drawing upon selected empirical and theoretical sources published between 2020 and 2025, the review critically examines various instructional approaches, including contextual teaching, literacy-based media, interactive reading aloud, and technology-enhanced learning, within the framework of the Kurikulum Merdeka. The data were collected from reputable academic databases using structured search criteria and analyzed thematically. The findings reveal that while several innovative strategies have proven effective—particularly in enhancing literacy, engagement, and communication skills—numerous challenges persist, such as limited teacher training, inadequate teaching materials, and the linguistic diversity of students. The novelty of this research lies in its integrative analysis, which combines pedagogical models with contextual variables (e.g., urban-rural divide, multilingual classrooms) and policy shifts, offering a more comprehensive perspective than previous reviews. It also highlights under-researched areas and underscores the importance of aligning strategy implementation with teacher competence and local school conditions. In conclusion, the study provides a holistic view of Indonesian language instruction at the elementary level and emphasizes the need for systemic support, especially in under-resourced environments. These insights are valuable not only for Indonesian educators and policymakers but also for other multilingual education systems seeking effective models of primary language instruction.
References
Allagui, B. (2024). A scaffolding intervention to improve self efficacy in source based writing. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454104
Clements, C. L. (2025). A critical evaluation of writing instruction and leadership in primary school contexts. Welsh Journal of Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.16922/focus12Wales
Ehlert, M. (2025). Time tells: Longitudinal changes in teachers’ beliefs and behaviour during implementation processes. Educational Research and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-00975-1
Falardeau, E., Guay, F., Dubois, P., & Pelletier, D. (2024). Effects of teacher implemented explicit writing instruction on the writing self efficacy and writing performance of 5th grade students. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.01.01
Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N. A., Abu Tineh, A., Alshaboul, Y., & Alazaizeh, M. A. (2025). A step-by-step approach to systematic reviews in educational research. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 549–566.
Graham, S. (2024). Evidence based recommendations for teaching writing: Younger students 5–11. Reading and Writing Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2357893
Harris, K. R. (2024). The Self-Regulated Strategy Development instructional model: Efficacious theoretical integration, scaling up, challenges, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09921-x
Karakuş, F. (2023). Teaching writing in primary schools: A systematic review of recent trends and themes. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(2), 356–368.
Lewis, B. P. (2024). Writing strategies for elementary multilingual writers. Education Sciences, 14(7), 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070759
Salas, N., Rivera, J., & Lin, Q. (2025). Long term effects of an SRSD writing intervention for primary school children. Reading & Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-025-10721-0
Sanchez, A. (2025). Guided play in the kindergarten classroom: One teacher’s inquiry into scaffolding play based writing instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53, 2089–2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01931-w
Taylor, K. S., Keane, K., Silverman, R. D., & Levine, S. (2024). Elementary teachers’ scaffolding in writing instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2024.2429509
Wendimu, S. G. (2024). Teacher-student collaboration: Using guided-writing instruction in elementary writing lessons. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241258020
Wilson, J. (2021). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of automated feedback and writing instruction. Computers & Education, 162, 104073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104073
Wright, A. D., Benson, S. N. K., & Reutzel, D. R. (2023). Motivation and engagement in early writing: Examining the classroom environment. The Reading Teacher, 76(3), 285–297.
Zhu, J. (2024). The mediating effect of writing self regulated learning strategies between teacher feedback and English writing proficiency. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.24001209
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Smart: Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





