THE INTEGRATION OF ENGLISH INTO MYANMAR’S NATIONAL CURRICULUM: A CRITICAL REVIEW

Authors

  • Ana Mae Monteza English, Department of Teacher Education, UM Digos College, City of Digos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61677/smart.v3i2.611

Keywords:

English curriculum, TPACK, academic literacy, teacher capacity, curriculum reform

Abstract

This study investigates the structural and pedagogical challenges in integrating English into Myanmar's national curriculum by employing a longitudinal mixed-methods design. The research aims to explore how secondary school teachers across urban and rural contexts implement the communicative, integrated English curriculum, particularly through the lens of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Data were collected over a one-year period through classroom observations, teacher interviews, student assessments, and policy document analysis. Findings reveal a significant gap between curriculum policy and classroom practice, largely influenced by limited teacher training, unequal access to technological resources, and disparities between urban and rural school settings. Despite curriculum reform initiatives promoting communicative competence and academic literacy, traditional teacher-centered approaches remain dominant. A key contribution of this research lies in its integration of TPACK and academic literacy into a holistic analytical model—rarely applied in Myanmar's multilingual and socioeconomically diverse context. The study further identifies inconsistencies in instructional materials and assessment practices across schools, underscoring the need for contextualized standardization. This research contributes a novel framework for English curriculum reform that connects national policy, teacher agency, and learner diversity, offering valuable insights for policymakers and education stakeholders in similar developing country settings. In conclusion, the study highlights that the success of English integration depends on systemic collaboration, continuous professional development, and adaptive policy implementation tailored to local contexts.

References

Fatimah, N., & Sarage, J. (2024). In service teachers’ problems in developing English textbooks for elementary school students. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 11(2), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v11i2.35446

Hall, J. M. (2021). English curriculum development in Myanmar: Primary school textbooks and reforming approaches. Muroran Institute of Technology.

Htet Htet Sandy. (2025). Exploring the impact of teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) on the instructional strategies of Grade 12 English curriculum in Myanmar: A systematic review of literature. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(7), 508–519. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i72141

Kargbo, M., Sandy, H., Samura, E., Tochukwu, N., & Machava, S. (2025). An investigation into the level of high school teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Myanmar. East African Journal of Education Studies, 8(1), 526–536. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.1.2775

Ma, X. (2025). Unique effects of home language on academic achievement at levels of homes and schools. Learning and Individual Differences. [DOI belum tersedia]

Maung, E. P. (2022). Myanmar EFL pre service teachers’ motivational orientations and research engagement. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 94–107.

Mary, M., Nuemaihom, A., & Intanoo, K. (2025). Approaches and benefits of teaching English through literature curriculum at Myanmar universities: Insights from stakeholders. World Journal of English Language, 15(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n2p85

Oo, K. M., & Okada, T. (2024). Myanmar EFL learners’ perspectives, structure, reasoning and literacy practices of argumentative writing: A needs analysis study. International Journal of English Language Studies, 12(1), 60–73.

Po, E. T. H., & Pransiska, R. (2023). Teaching English to very young learners in kindergartens in Myanmar. ALSYSTECH Journal of Education Technology, 1(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsystech.v1i1.1664

Qasserras, L. (2023). Systematic review of communicative language teaching (CLT) in language education: A balanced perspective. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(6), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.763

Than, N. A. A., & Pianchana, T. (2024). The development of English speaking skills using online collaborative learning: Myanmar migrants in Thailand. ThaiTESOL Journal, 37(1), 132–155.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Tun, P. W. (2024). Investigating teachers’ implementation of a new communicative English language curriculum in Myanmar primary schools. ELTED Journal, 27, 1–20.

Win, C. C. (2022). Myanmar English majors’ perceptions of learner autonomy: A study of university students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 79–94.

Wong, M. S. (2024). Inside the crucible: Resistance and resilience in a decade of English language educators in Myanmar. TESOL Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.885

Yang, S. (2024). Unlocking language teacher wellbeing amid curriculum reform in EFL contexts. Language Teaching Research. [DOI belum tersedia]

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Published

2025-11-17